*banner
 
Commands
  Search pubs database

Quick search by ...
 
 
Year
  2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003

Group
  agv
automotive
bipeds
car
certafcs
chess
chesslocal
cps
dgc3
gm
hcddes
hyper
ieee1588
naomi
pret
ptconf
pthomas
ptides
ptolemy
researchers
thales

Communication Synthesis with Applications to On-Chip Communication and Building Automation Systems
Alessandro Pinto

Citation
Alessandro Pinto. "Communication Synthesis with Applications to On-Chip Communication and Building Automation Systems". Talk or presentation, 27, November, 2007.

Abstract

Integration is the next big challenge in Embedded System Design (ESD). The complexity of electronics, from chips to building automation systems, increases at each product generation, while time-to-market shrinks. To overcome the possible barriers coming from a linear increase of productivity, it has become common to assemble systems out of off-the shelf components. This approach to ESD brings up many issues that are not related to the components themselves but rather to the way in which they interact. The problem of interconnecting components correctly appears at all levels of abstraction. At the design entry level, each piece of the system is usually described with the model of computation that most naturally captures its behavior. When the entire system is put together, the interaction between different parts requires the definition of the interaction among heterogeneous models. At lower levels of abstraction, the problems reduces to the design of the actual communication architecture that allows the components to communicate. Correctness at this level is defined also with respect to performance metrics like latency, bandwidth and reliability.

Thus, given a collection of agents and the way in which they communicate (usually specified by a set of point-to-point communication requirements) the embedded system designer faces the problem of defining a communication structure such that the communication requirements are satisfied and the cost is minimized. This problem is not trivial considering the number of different ways in which the abstract point-to-point specification can be refined into a concrete communication structure. However, the flexibility provided by the plethora of communication technologies available today, is a great opportunity to “guarantee performance at minimum cost”: a motto for the embedded system community.

I will present our on-going research effort toward the development of an infrastructure for networked embedded systems. I will motivate our work using two design drivers: on-chip communication and building automation systems, and I will argue that the same theory can be applied independently from the specific application. Then, I will show how the theory has been used to develop a tool for the automatic design of communication structures and I will present some preliminary results. I will conclude with a list of research directions.

Electronic downloads

Citation formats  
  • HTML
    Alessandro Pinto. <a
    href="http://chess.eecs.berkeley.edu/pubs/378.html"><i>Communication
    Synthesis with Applications to On-Chip Communication and
    Building Automation Systems</i></a>, Talk or
    presentation,  27, November, 2007.
  • Plain text
    Alessandro Pinto. "Communication Synthesis with Applications
    to On-Chip Communication and Building Automation Systems".
    Talk or presentation,  27, November, 2007.
  • BibTeX
    @presentation{Pinto07_CommunicationSynthesisWithApplicationsToOnChipCommunication,
        author = {Alessandro Pinto},
        title = {Communication Synthesis with Applications to
                  On-Chip Communication and Building Automation
                  Systems},
        day = {27},
        month = {November},
        year = {2007},
        abstract = {

    Integration is the next big challenge in Embedded System Design (ESD). The complexity of electronics, from chips to building automation systems, increases at each product generation, while time-to-market shrinks. To overcome the possible barriers coming from a linear increase of productivity, it has become common to assemble systems out of off-the shelf components. This approach to ESD brings up many issues that are not related to the components themselves but rather to the way in which they interact. The problem of interconnecting components correctly appears at all levels of abstraction. At the design entry level, each piece of the system is usually described with the model of computation that most naturally captures its behavior. When the entire system is put together, the interaction between different parts requires the definition of the interaction among heterogeneous models. At lower levels of abstraction, the problems reduces to the design of the actual communication architecture that allows the components to communicate. Correctness at this level is defined also with respect to performance metrics like latency, bandwidth and reliability.

    Thus, given a collection of agents and the way in which they communicate (usually specified by a set of point-to-point communication requirements) the embedded system designer faces the problem of defining a communication structure such that the communication requirements are satisfied and the cost is minimized. This problem is not trivial considering the number of different ways in which the abstract point-to-point specification can be refined into a concrete communication structure. However, the flexibility provided by the plethora of communication technologies available today, is a great opportunity to “guarantee performance at minimum cost”: a motto for the embedded system community.

    I will present our on-going research effort toward the development of an infrastructure for networked embedded systems. I will motivate our work using two design drivers: on-chip communication and building automation systems, and I will argue that the same theory can be applied independently from the specific application. Then, I will show how the theory has been used to develop a tool for the automatic design of communication structures and I will present some preliminary results. I will conclude with a list of research directions.

    }, URL = {http://chess.eecs.berkeley.edu/pubs/378.html} }

Posted by Douglas Densmore on 28 Nov 2007.
For additional information, see the Publications FAQ or contact webmaster at chess eecs berkeley edu..

Notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright.

You are not logged in 
©2002-2009 Chess